千文網(wǎng)小編為你整理了多篇相關的《2000字的小說讀后感》，但愿對你工作學習有幫助，當然你在千文網(wǎng)還可以找到更多《2000字的小說讀后感》。

第一篇：讀后感2000字

孤獨作為一種美學，是可能的嗎?

這是我翻看蔣勛新著《孤獨六講》前內心最迫切的猶疑。孤獨，當下好似流感，每個人或多或少都患染過。吊詭之處在于，最害怕孤獨的現(xiàn)代人其實最孤獨。很簡單，現(xiàn)代性的一大特點即是，個體意識的明確。隨之而來的既有所謂獨立人格的確立，也有此前意想不到的困境，譬如說孤獨。更搞笑的是，當人們意識到陷入孤獨之境時，第一反應則是回避孤獨，這是群居動物的本性，卻于解脫孤獨無益無用。更深在的問題是，當孤獨作為一種群體性癥候，我們能否給予孤獨多一重維度的探勘，并賦予美學上的好處，使得孤獨不再只是一個現(xiàn)代人口中熟濫的詞語，心中單一錯誤的觀念呢?

這回，聽蔣勛談孤獨，總算能將上述所言一一落實了。書分六輯，分別講述殘酷青春里野獸般奔突的“情欲孤獨”，眾聲喧嘩卻無人聆聽的“語言孤獨”，始于躊躇滿志最后落寞寂寥的“革命孤獨”，潛藏于人性內在本質的“暴力孤獨”，不可思不可議的“思維孤獨”，以愛之名捆縛與被捆縛的“倫理孤獨”，幾乎將關于“孤獨”的話題論述得題無剩義。蔣勛是美的善述者，知性而動情，于是這給他關于孤獨的議論添了一層難得美學觀照，正因孤獨難談，談得不好，讀者越發(fā)憂悒孤獨。

每一天看一章，舍不得快快讀完。最喜愛“革命孤獨”那一章。中國好革命，但似乎至今未有對革命美學的深度透視，歷來談革命者多是囂騷空論，催生的不是對于革命的切實了解，反倒激發(fā)出不自知的群體盲目。至于由革命而言及孤獨，更是少見。在蔣勛看來，“革命跟詩有關，跟美學有關，而它最后導致的是一種巨大的孤獨感”，“正因唯有孤獨感會讓人堅信烏托邦”。革命者并非僅是不滿現(xiàn)狀，毋寧說對現(xiàn)狀的不滿只是革命者內心孤獨的一種外在表現(xiàn)，巨大的孤獨感迫使革命者透過革命來消解或完成自己的孤獨。好像書中提到的托爾斯泰，拋棄爵位、土地、財產(chǎn)，毅然出走。若是僅從表面所謂對農(nóng)奴的關切來明白，未免現(xiàn)實功利了點，在那里，托爾斯泰想要進行的是一場關于內心的革命，自我的革命。爵位、土地、財產(chǎn)不僅僅是他所擁有的物質，同時這些物質是與整個階級體制緊密聯(lián)系的。當他決然舍棄這些時，他是在與這背后的階級體制作戰(zhàn)，同時更是在與內心的不安作戰(zhàn)。這種內心的革命其實是越出世俗藩籬的，而但凡超越世俗所能容納之定則之人，必定要飽受譏嘲，正因世俗本身不容許這樣。常識告訴我們，這些革命者注定是失敗者。

有深意的是，失敗者才能獲致美學好處。在蔣勛眼里，《史記》就是司馬遷為無數(shù)失敗者所進行的美學書寫，他“成功地營造了一個革命者美麗的結局和孤獨感”，進而動問“文學是不是去書寫一個孤獨者內心的荒涼，而使成功者或奪得政權的那個人感到害怕?”，“正因他有所得也有所失，贏了政權卻輸了詩與美”。這是我讀見的對《史記》最好最美的一種解讀。

我們這天讀《史記》，照樣會喜愛那個失敗的項羽，而不怎樣喜愛那個最終成功的劉邦。理性的讀者也許會猜測彼時情形是否果真如此，但“項羽的英雄化正代表了司馬遷內心對孤獨者的致敬”。那里有顏容憔悴跳水自沉的屈原，有易水畔的荊軻，有不為俗世所容的游俠。因此“司馬遷是以《史記》對抗權力，取得權力的人，就失去美學的位置”。

因此再度思考“什么是革命孤獨”的問題時，我們會把革命者視為一個懷抱夢想?yún)s最終無法實現(xiàn)夢想的人。正因懷抱夢想，因此有詩與美的可能;正因終其世無法實現(xiàn)，也就不可能為任何體制雖捆縛。這種現(xiàn)實好處上的失敗造就出強大的美學力量，進而拷問世俗——我們到底能不能容納他們?有關愛的名言

而一個成熟健康的社會，就應擁有足夠多的面向與可能。

那么，現(xiàn)代人如此懼怕孤獨，是不是正是正因我們太過單一，社會面向不夠豐富呢?

在這個好處上，我歆服蔣勛所言“這本書要談的不是如何消除孤獨，而是如何完成孤獨，如何給予孤獨，如何尊重孤獨”。

昆德拉在評析弗朗西斯?培根時如此說道：“畫家的強暴之手以‘突兀暴烈的手勢’放在肖像主人的臉上，試圖在某個深處，找出肖像主人逃逸的‘我’?！比绻栌眠@個詮釋，我愿說，對“孤獨”的探討與珍惜，本質上也正是基于找尋那個逃逸的“我”的企圖。在與自己相處之時，我們質問自己，一個人會在何等情形下變得不可辨識自己?又會在何等情形下歪斜到仍然是自己?換言之，一個人之因此為自己的邊界，到底在哪里?

第二篇：讀后感2000字

Were one to have the profound hatred, were one to avenge and harm his family who seems too far to harm, he would be either a hero or a monster. Should he fight the unbeatable foe and right the wrong, should he bear with unbearable sorrow, should he ruin himself in twisted enthusiasm, he would be Hamlet.

Among all the masterpieces of William Shakespeare, “Hamlet”， undoubtedly is worshipped and as one of the most successful and admired tragedies, while the character Hamlet remains one of the most loved dramatis personas in all-time history of literature.

To have read Shakespeare's “Romeo and Juliet” by the age of 16, I was moved to tears, while having no empathy with his another great one “Tempest”。 Presumably when I get 60 or older, I could be wise enough to understand the latter, but find it nothing worthwhile to go over the former one, where lays a romantic story that the only youngsters are addicted to. But it's a fact that whenever in our lifetime after gaining such experiences as getting through hard times, or, finding a real self, from “Hamlet”， we always find something that we consider as perpetuation, which is worth deep thoughts. This is because it highlights Hamlet's choices of life, choices made under certain circumstances of history and society, requested by the fate extraordinary to Hamlet himself, but ordinary to mankind. That is, to some extent, his experiences make a similar one to ours and, his destiny is something we're facing sometime in our own lives.

We're possibly the same. We explore the truth in the dark. We discover facts from the mist. We lose ourselves in determinations. We trespass on which we're forbid to be, hesitates at love and hatred, and struggle to rebuild system of values and spiritual prop in a world without standards and scales of standards.

Hamlet couldn't have been perfect. He is very much a person motivated by irrational enthusiasm, impetuous enough to kill Polonius only to find it's a mistake as the victim is not the king. But somehow it is for his poor enthusiasm, his weakness of humanity, that Hamlet touches countless readers, as everyone makes out himself from the ill-fated prince.

Hamlet's “revenge” isn't so much simply the killing of Claudius, as it is the purging of all the rottenness in the Danish court. And although it costs him his life, he succeeds.

At some time, we all consider how much wrong there is in the world. “Hamlet” gives us a chance to watch an ordinary person consciously choose to say “No!” to the world's wrongness and falsities, and to strike back with power. William Shakespeare held up the mirror to something in us that is precious.

I hear Hamlet thinking, “Too many people waste too much effort doing things that are not worthwhile. It's a bad world, and I am far from a perfect human being. We all end up dead in the end. So I am going to do something worthwhile, and do it right.”

I hear him wondering, “What is a man, If his chief good and market of his time. Is but to sleep and feed? A beast, no more.”

I hear him whispering “To be, or not to be, aye, there's the point. To die, to sleep, is that all? Aye, all.”

That makes a hero to me, regardless of his blindness and madness which haunt everyone for a while in his time. Thousands of readers may have thousands of their own Hamlet, but there's something that stays the same, that Hamlet dares to run, where the brave dare not go. That's his quest.

Thinks about it.