千文網(wǎng)小編為你整理了多篇相關(guān)的《誠(chéng)信友善演講稿(范文5篇)》，但愿對(duì)你工作學(xué)習(xí)有幫助，當(dāng)然你在千文網(wǎng)還可以找到更多《誠(chéng)信友善演講稿(范文5篇)》。

第一篇：誠(chéng)信友善演講稿

尊敬的老師，親愛的同學(xué)：

大家好！

同學(xué)們，你們是否聽說過這樣一句話：“誠(chéng)信友善不是智慧，但是這常常能放射出比智慧更加誘人的光芒?！泵ＣＨ撕?，蕓蕓眾生，我們生活中哪一處能缺乏誠(chéng)信友善？誠(chéng)信友善是什么？誠(chéng)信友善是沙漠中的一汪清泉，是陰云遮不住的一片晴空，是巨大痛苦中的一劑良藥，是社會(huì)主義核心價(jià)值觀中的一面閃亮旗幟。

不友善的校園會(huì)怎樣？我們可想而知，我想那樣的校園不會(huì)是我們大家所向往的。有時(shí)候，一件很小的事也會(huì)鬧的天翻地覆不可開交，從而傷害到彼此。一個(gè)優(yōu)秀的人往往具備“誠(chéng)信立身，友善待人”的品質(zhì)，我覺得做到“誠(chéng)信立身，友善待人”就要做到以下幾點(diǎn)：

1、學(xué)會(huì)以誠(chéng)待人，在生活中不欺騙他人，說話必須真誠(chéng)，為他人著想。

2、學(xué)會(huì)友善待人，對(duì)他人友善，不把小矛盾放在心上，不責(zé)怪他人。

3、學(xué)會(huì)換位思考，將心比心，當(dāng)朋友不開心鬧情緒時(shí)，我們要抽時(shí)間去陪陪他，給予理解；當(dāng)看到同學(xué)做一些不文明舉止時(shí)，我們要勇敢站出來，及時(shí)制止；當(dāng)答應(yīng)別人要做某事時(shí)，就要努力去完成，做到言而有信。

這些微不足道的小事，就能使我們校園更美麗更和諧，當(dāng)然也需要我們有勇氣與智慧，一旦每個(gè)人都把誠(chéng)信友善與和諧當(dāng)成習(xí)慣，每個(gè)人都去為此付出一些力量，那我們的校園豈不是更和諧更多姿多彩！

我們盼望誠(chéng)信友善和諧的校園，使我們能夠簡(jiǎn)單、愉悅的學(xué)習(xí)。

我們渴望誠(chéng)信友善和諧的校園，使我們能夠健康、快樂的成長(zhǎng)。

它如初春的一縷風(fēng)，悄悄聯(lián)系著你、我、他。

它如盛夏的一樹綠蔭，無私的為你我遮擋炎夏酷暑。

它如金秋的一片黃葉，輕輕地回歸到大地母親懷抱。

它如寒冬的一場(chǎng)大雪，默默地孕育著新生的希望。

結(jié)合學(xué)校三告別三向活動(dòng)，讓我們一同攜起手來，貢獻(xiàn)自己微薄的力量，讓我們?cè)谝稽c(diǎn)一滴的小事中都充滿著友善，充滿著力量，讓整個(gè)校園都充滿著誠(chéng)信、友善和諧的因子！讓我們用自己的行動(dòng)積極踐行誠(chéng)信友善的價(jià)值觀，讓我們一起做一個(gè)“誠(chéng)信立身，友善待人”的人吧！

我的演講完畢，謝謝大家！

第二篇：誠(chéng)信友善演講稿

尊敬的領(lǐng)導(dǎo)、老師、親愛的同學(xué)們：

大家早上好！我來自高一一年級(jí)二班。今天我的題目是《誠(chéng)信立身，友善待人》。

誠(chéng)信友愛是沙漠里的清泉，是云遮不住的晴空，是偉大痛苦中的良藥，是社會(huì)主義核心價(jià)值觀的閃亮旗幟。社會(huì)主義核心價(jià)值觀是公民思想道德建設(shè)的核心，是學(xué)校德育的靈魂，是當(dāng)代青年的正確價(jià)值取向。作為新時(shí)代的高中生，毫無疑問，我們應(yīng)該大力踐行社會(huì)主義核心價(jià)值觀，誠(chéng)實(shí)待人，善待他人。

高爾基曾經(jīng)說過，如果你走上誠(chéng)實(shí)生活的道路，你就會(huì)問心無愧。這正是我們?cè)谏鐣?huì)主義核心價(jià)值觀中大力提倡的道德品質(zhì)。真誠(chéng)意味著真誠(chéng)和誠(chéng)實(shí)；信仰就是信守承諾，守信用。誠(chéng)信的基本含義是信守承諾，信守承諾，沒有欺騙。通俗點(diǎn)說就是老實(shí)，做老實(shí)的事，老實(shí)。這讓我想起了在河南賣雞蛋的大哥任清河。他原來的店被拆了，擔(dān)心店里有蛋票的顧客找不到店，就在老店址等了三個(gè)月。這種看似平凡的等待引起了人們的關(guān)注和贊譽(yù)，他在網(wǎng)上被網(wǎng)友稱為“老實(shí)蛋哥”。其實(shí)誠(chéng)信不僅是一種良好的個(gè)人品質(zhì)，是契約精神下的道德規(guī)范，更是一種可以改變現(xiàn)實(shí)的“技能”。中國(guó)傳統(tǒng)文化說大智若愚，大技若愚，誠(chéng)信其實(shí)就是一個(gè)很好的例子。所以作為中學(xué)生，要言出必行，對(duì)自己誠(chéng)實(shí)，待人真誠(chéng)。

“友好”是人際交往中必要的道德標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。如果人們能夠以“善待他人”的態(tài)度處理好日常生活中的各種人際關(guān)系，我們的生活就會(huì)充滿陽光。友好是拉近人與人之間距離的法寶。做事情是友善的表現(xiàn)，比如說話好聽，留有做事的余地，不與同學(xué)發(fā)生沖突，原諒別人的錯(cuò)誤，主動(dòng)承擔(dān)辛苦。我們每個(gè)人都想生活在友好愉快的氛圍中，我們都想被善良、寬容和溫暖所包圍.這就要求我們每一個(gè)同學(xué)都要以友好的態(tài)度與同學(xué)、老師、家人相處，共同營(yíng)造一個(gè)處處是珍妮弗的心情、溫馨和諧的生活環(huán)境。

同學(xué)們，讓我們用自己的行動(dòng)積極踐行社會(huì)主義核心價(jià)值觀，讓整個(gè)校園充滿誠(chéng)信、友好、和諧，讓我們的學(xué)校變得更好。讓我們做一個(gè)對(duì)別人誠(chéng)實(shí)友好的人。

我的演講結(jié)束了，謝謝！

第三篇：大學(xué)英語演講稿

Mr. Chairman, Senator Thurmond, members of the committee, my name is Anita F. Hill, and I am a professor of law at the University of Oklahoma. I was born on a farm in Okmulgee County, Oklahoma, in 1956. I am the youngest of 13 children. I had my early education in Okmulgee County. My father, Albert Hill, is a farmer in that area. My mother's name is Irma Hill. She is also a farmer and a housewife.

My childhood was one of a lot of hard work and not much money, but it was one of solid family affection, as represented by my parents. I was reared in a religious atmosphere in the Baptist faith, and I have been a member of the Antioch Baptist Church in Tulsa, Oklahoma, since 1983. It is a very warm part of my life at the present time.

For my undergraduate work, I went to Oklahoma State University and graduated from there in 1977. I am attaching to this statement a copy of my resume for further details of my education.

I graduated from the university with academic honors and proceeded to the Yale Law School, where I received my JD degree in 1980. Upon graduation from law school, I became a practicing lawyer with the Washington, DC, firm of Ward, Hardraker, and Ross.

In 1981, I was introduced to now Judge Thomas by a mutual friend. Judge Thomas told me that he was anticipating a political appointment, and he asked if I would be interested in working with him. He was, in fact, appointed as Assistant Secretary of Education for Civil Rights. After he had taken that post, he asked if I would become his assistant, and I accepted that position.

In my early period there, I had two major projects. The first was an article I wrote for Judge Thomas' signature on the education of minority students. The second was the organization of a seminar on high-risk students which was abandoned because Judge Thomas transferred to the EEOC where he became the chairman of that office.

During this period at the Department of Education, my working relationship with Judge Thomas was positive. I had a good deal of responsibility and independence. I thought he respected my work and that he trusted my judgment. After approximately three months of working there, he asked me to go out socially with him.

What happened next and telling the world about it are the two most difficult things -- experiences of my life. It is only after a great deal of agonizing consideration and sleepless number -- a great number of sleepless nights that I am able to talk of these unpleasant matters to anyone but my close friends.

I declined the invitation to go out socially with him and explained to him that I thought it would jeopardize what at the time I considered to be a very good working relationship. I had a normal social life with other men outside of the office. I believed then, as now, that having a social relationship with a person who was supervising my work would be ill-advised. I was very uncomfortable with the idea and told him so.

I thought that by saying no and explaining my reasons my employer would abandon his social suggestions. However, to my regret, in the following few weeks, he continued to ask me out on several occasions. He pressed me to justify my reasons for saying no to him. These incidents took place in his office or mine. They were in the form of private conversations which would not have been overheard by anyone else.

My working relationship became even more strained when Judge Thomas began to use work situations to discuss sex. On these occasions, he would call me into his office for reports on education issues and projects, or he might suggest that, because of the time pressures of his schedule, we go to lunch to a government cafeteria. After a brief discussion of work, he would turn the conversation to a discussion of sexual matters.

His conversations were very vivid. He spoke about acts that he had seen in pornographic films involving such matters as women having sex with animals and films showing group sex or rape scenes. He talked about pornographic materials depicting individuals with large penises or large breasts involved in various sex acts. On several occasions, Thomas told me graphically of his own sexual prowess.

Because I was extremely uncomfortable talking about sex with him at all and particularly in such a graphic way, I told him that I did not want to talk about these subjects. I would also try to change the subject to education matters or to nonsexual personal matters such as his background or his beliefs. My efforts to change the subject were rarely successful.

Throughout the period of these conversations, he also from time to time asked me for social engagements. My reaction to these conversations was to avoid them by eliminating opportunities for us to engage in extended conversations. This was difficult because at the time I was his only assistant at the Office of Education -- or Office for Civil Rights.

During the latter part of my time at the Department of Education, the social pressures and any conversation of his offensive behavior ended. I began both to believe and hope that our working relationship could be a proper, cordial, and professional one.

When Judge Thomas was made chair of the EEOC, I needed to face the question of whether to go with him. I was asked to do so, and I did. The work itself was interesting, and at that time it appeared that the sexual overtures which had so troubled me had ended. I also faced the realistic fact that I had no alternative job. While I might have gone back to private practice, perhaps in my old firm or at another, I was dedicated to civil rights work, and my first choice was to be in that field. Moreover, the Department of Education itself was a dubious venture. President Reagan was seeking to abolish the entire department.

For my first months at the EEOC, where I continued to be an assistant to Judge Thomas, there were no sexual conversations or overtures. However, during the fall and winter of 1982, these began again. The comments were random and ranged from pressing me about why I didn't go out with him to remarks about my personal appearance. I remember his saying that some day I would have to tell him the real reason that I wouldn't go out with him.

第四篇：關(guān)于友善演講稿

“友善”是人際交往中必須具備的道德規(guī)范，如果人們都能以“與人為善“的態(tài)度去處理日常生活中各種各樣的人際關(guān)系，我們的生活都會(huì)充滿陽光。

如果你想做一個(gè)愉快的孩子，讓自己的身邊都充滿歡樂，就用你一顆友善的心去對(duì)待他人。那么，在和別人打交道時(shí)，如何做到“與人為善”呢？首先，要學(xué)會(huì)寬容。寬容就是人與人之間相處時(shí)能充分的理解他人、體諒他人，擁有寬闊的胸懷。同學(xué)們生活在一起，產(chǎn)生一點(diǎn)摩擦是正常的。俗話說牙齒和舌頭也會(huì)“打架”，但是矛盾發(fā)生后，應(yīng)該學(xué)會(huì)忍耐、包容、體諒他人，不能斤斤計(jì)較，應(yīng)該讓矛盾迅速化解，也就是人們常說的：“退一步海闊天空”。所以，我們應(yīng)該學(xué)會(huì)寬容，使自己的周圍充滿歡樂。其次，在平時(shí)生活中，應(yīng)該學(xué)會(huì)說：“對(duì)不起”。你可別小看這三個(gè)字，它的`作用可大了，在處理同學(xué)關(guān)系時(shí)有著出奇的效果。

我們每個(gè)人都希望生活在友好、愉快的氛圍中，都希望自己的周圍充滿善良、寬容和溫馨……這就需要我們每一個(gè)同學(xué)以友善的態(tài)度與同學(xué)相處、與老師相處、與家人相處，共同營(yíng)造一個(gè)心情舒暢，處處溫暖和諧的生活環(huán)境。同學(xué)們，讓我們學(xué)會(huì)友善待人，使我們的集體變得更加美好。

謝謝大家！

第五篇：篇一友善演講稿

我有一位十分要好的朋友，無論是剛和她相識(shí)的、還是和她交往已久的人都說她人實(shí)在容易相處、待人友善的不得了。我很疑惑，于是我問過自己一名剛與她相識(shí)的同學(xué)，她說“我第一次看見她的時(shí)候，她就沖我笑，而且，笑得很真誠(chéng)。即使是我們都忙碌的擦肩而過時(shí)她仍會(huì)對(duì)我微笑和點(diǎn)頭?！弊蛱煳易卉嚾ノ洳臅r(shí)候，親眼目睹了這樣的一幕，在本來就人滿為患的公交上，兩個(gè)小伙子為了一個(gè)空位爭(zhēng)吵起來，相互辱罵、橫眉冷眼。我不由感慨而生“為什么要為一個(gè)座位你爭(zhēng)我搶呢？又不是什么大事？相互謙讓，待人友善的美德去了哪里？”

“友善”，最為傳統(tǒng)的理解便是“友好”、“善良”，對(duì)人友好，心地善良。當(dāng)然，在座的每位同學(xué)都了解友善這個(gè)詞語，友善待人究竟會(huì)給我們帶來怎樣的益處呢？我們又要如何去友善待人呢？

曾經(jīng)看過這樣一個(gè)故事：講的是大風(fēng)和太陽比賽誰更有威力。大風(fēng)一個(gè)勁兒的吹穿著厚大衣的老頭兒，想讓他把大衣脫下來?？上?，老頭兒反而越裹越緊。而太陽對(duì)著老頭兒燦爛的微笑，不一會(huì)兒，老頭兒便把大衣脫掉了。這就是友善的力量。他讓我們親近而溫暖，不是畏懼害怕，迫于無奈服從你，而是心甘情愿的遵循你的要求。當(dāng)我們?cè)谂c人共事時(shí)，若是友善待人，不僅可以快速達(dá)到我們的目標(biāo)，而且也會(huì)使得大家交往和諧，成為好朋友。

當(dāng)然，友善的力量也許比這、比我們想象的更為強(qiáng)大。一個(gè)少年在企圖行竊時(shí)，被躺在床上的一位女孩發(fā)現(xiàn)了。女孩并沒有報(bào)警，而是裝作并不知道他是小偷，熱情地邀請(qǐng)他與自己聊天。他們聊得挺開心。少年臨走前，女孩用自己的阿馬提小提琴為他拉了一首曲子，然后又把琴送給了少年。后來，當(dāng)少年再去找女孩時(shí)，女孩因患骨癌已離開了人世，在她青色的墓碑上鐫刻著“把友善奉獻(xiàn)給這個(gè)世界，所以我快樂”。少年從此變了樣，他在貧困和苦難中重拾自尊，心中燃起了走出逆境的熊熊烈火！最終，昔日的少年成材了，在世界第一流的悉尼大劇院，他深情地拉起了悠揚(yáng)的曲調(diào)――把它獻(xiàn)給那位女孩。小女孩善待少年，是為了體面地維護(hù)他的尊嚴(yán)。她也許永遠(yuǎn)不會(huì)意識(shí)到，她的友善、寬容和愛心――就如紫羅蘭把它的香氣留在那踩扁了它的腳底上，怎樣震撼了一個(gè)迷途少年的心，讓他重新樹立了信念，揚(yáng)起生活的風(fēng)帆。一次友善的交談，一首優(yōu)美的曲子，就這樣改變了人的一生！

作為一名大學(xué)生，友善不僅是我們要遵守的基本道德行為規(guī)范，而且也是決定我們大學(xué)生成功、成才的關(guān)鍵因素。友善作為EQ中的核心因素，可以幫助一個(gè)人在他的事業(yè)中更加敏銳的感知自己的情感，做到以誠(chéng)待人，尊重、理解、同情他人等一系列友善的言行，使其具有建立和處理好人際關(guān)系的能力。

所以，我們每個(gè)人都應(yīng)該友善待人。

友善待人意味著我們要從微笑做起，微笑是友善的最佳代言人。微笑，是人類最基本的動(dòng)作。微笑，似蓓蕾初綻。真誠(chéng)和善良，在微笑中洋溢著感人肺腑的芳香。微笑的風(fēng)采，包含著豐富的內(nèi)涵。朋友在一起時(shí)的自然微笑，是結(jié)交的愉悅心情的流露；而朋友分離時(shí)送上一分依戀不舍的微笑，蘊(yùn)含了言之不盡的美好祝福和無限的牽掛。陌生人在相見時(shí)微微一笑，可以減少隔閡，增加信任，放松氣氛，臨時(shí)打造一座溝通的橋梁。微笑可以對(duì)等或不對(duì)等的換來微笑，你給予人家的微笑，很可能也會(huì)換來同你的微笑內(nèi)容、深淺相同的微笑。因此，一個(gè)不吝嗇微笑的人，對(duì)他微笑的人也會(huì)更多。所以說，帶著微笑出行的人不會(huì)感到孤獨(dú)，帶著微笑工作的人不會(huì)感到煩悶，帶著微笑回家的人不會(huì)感到冷清。對(duì)你看見的每個(gè)人微笑是你開始友善的第一步。

友善待人自然離不開寬容他人。生活中我們每個(gè)人難免與別人產(chǎn)生摩擦、誤會(huì)、甚至仇恨；這時(shí)別忘了在自己心里裝滿寬容。寬容其實(shí)就是忍耐。同伴的批評(píng)、朋友的誤解，過多的爭(zhēng)辯和“反擊”實(shí)不足取，惟有冷靜、忍耐、諒解最重要。相信這句名言：“寬容是在荊棘叢中長(zhǎng)出來的谷?！?。如果有那么一點(diǎn)點(diǎn)寬容的胸懷，有那么一點(diǎn)點(diǎn)冷靜和忍耐，有那么一

點(diǎn)點(diǎn)諒解和平和，那個(gè)大學(xué)生就不會(huì)發(fā)生為一點(diǎn)小事釀出驚人的悲劇。仇恨是一把雙刃劍，報(bào)復(fù)別人的同時(shí)，自己也同樣受到傷害，所以“冤冤相報(bào)'的結(jié)果就是‘兩敗俱傷”。心中裝著仇恨的人的人生是痛苦而不幸的人生，只有放下仇恨選擇寬容，糾纏在心中的死結(jié)才會(huì)豁然脫開，心中才會(huì)出現(xiàn)安詳、純凈的“愛之天空”――恨能挑起事端，愛能征服一切。就像那位在小偷到來時(shí)為之彈奏的小女孩兒一樣。我們的寬容，也是友善的.體現(xiàn)。

其實(shí)，友善待人很簡(jiǎn)單。我們?cè)谏钪卸嘧龅健拔鹨陨菩《粸椤?、“勿以惡小而為之”就可以了。不要因?yàn)橥瑢W(xué)不小心弄臟了你的新衣服而生氣，不要因?yàn)槭程门抨?duì)人多而選擇插隊(duì)，給公交上的老人小孩讓個(gè)座位，給擦肩而過的路人一抹微笑，給不小心做錯(cuò)事的朋友一次改過機(jī)會(huì)，自覺的在圖書館把手機(jī)調(diào)靜……待人友善，我們能做的還有很多。